CGNS 2006 Summary
Overall goals / priorities
From CGNS Charter,
- Ensure CGNS remains useful, accessible, easy to use, and publicly
available
- Ensure maintenance of software, docs, and website
- Provide mechanism for evolution of the standard
- Promote acceptance
- Provide mechanism for answering questions & exchanging
ideas
- Determine means by which CGNS is supported
Accomplishments 2006
- Maintenance
- Went to release 2.5 - bug fixes, tweaks, added capabilities
- UsersGuideCode upgraded to include C routines
- Evolution
- Rind-for-unstructured capability added
- Certain connectivity info made optional for patching (docs
& MLL fixed)
- Face-center connectivity now allowed (doc fix only)
- Multiple-zone connectivity proposal accepted, but not
implemented yet
- 2 new proposals on the table (Regions & Face-based)
- Acceptance
- San Francisco Tutorial session & Panel discussion held
- Latest SIDS in AIAA's hands (Recommended Practice document
update)
- CGNS was represented/discussed at an NOAA workshop
- Answering questions & Exchanging ideas
- Website improved & reorganized to include FAQ page
- CGNSTalk archiving process improved
- Support
- 3 new steering committee members added
Current emphasis
- Technical:
- Seamless inter-usability between ADF and HDF5 (with HDF5
"officially" recommended by the committee)
- Parallel HDF5 capability
- Ensure bugs get fixed & docs remain up-to-date
- Keep up with extensions (submission / approval / implementation)
- Other:
- Promote acceptance through:
- Papers/presentations (e.g., Poinot, Hauser 2005 & 2006)
- Tutorial Session at AIAA San Francisco meeting 2006
- Panel Discussion at San Francisco meeting 2006
- Develop possible short course for AIAA (in process)
New/additional emphasis needed?
- Strive to secure funding for software development and support
(through AIAA short course? other?)
- Improve extension proposal, approval, and implementation process
- Proposal template? Guaranteed process timeline?
- Extending MLL is difficult
- Develop official certification process
- Define levels of compliance?
- More extensive updates to website - include Wiki page?
- Ideas to overcome vendor & user inertia?
- If we want to pursue any of these items, they need a leader and
probably a small sub-committee